Values in research design

Values in Research Design

Casey HelgesonLead: Casey Helgeson
Counselor: Nancy Tuana

This research, led by Casey Helgeson, examines value judgments in climate-risk research and how those values affect the research's usefulness for real-world decision-making. The values of stakeholders and decision makers can often differ from those who conduct the research. When these differences are not acknowledged or included in the research process, the research produced may lack relevance to the desired end user or may even lead to policy recommendations that don't fit communities' needs. The publications below illustrate frameworks for deliberative and transparent incorporation of relevant values into research processes. Closely connected research within MACH includes the Decision Analysis: Flood Risk and Federal Funding project. On the work of that project, see the video linked below featuring research led by Adam Pollack and Sara Santamaria-Aguilar.

Go back to the Adaptation Strategy Design Focus Area

Other Projects in the Adaptation Strategy Design Focus Area

Decision Analysis: Flood Risk and Federal Funding
Decision Analysis: Coastal Protection Strategies
Decision-Analysis: Designing Storm Drainage Systems
Multi-Level Funding Mechanisms of Climate Adaptation & Environmental Justice Programs

Products

Publications

Helgeson, C., Auermuller, L., Bennett Gayle, D., Dangendorf, S., Gilmore, E. A., Keller, K., ... & Wahl, T. (2025). Exploratory scoping of place‐based opportunities for convergence research. Earth's Future, 13(3), e2024EF004908.
DOI: 10.1029/2024EF004908

Helgeson, C., Keller, K., Nicholas, R. E., Srikrishnan, V., Cooper, C., Smithwick, E. A. H., & Tuana, N. (2024). Integrating values to improve the relevance of climate‐risk research. Earth's Future, 12,e2022EF003025.
DOI: 10.1029/2022EF003025